Contact   About this website  Go to the Belgium.be portal  Go to the SPF portal   Go to the IBGE-BIM Website    Go to the Portal of the Walloon Region    Go to the Website of the Flemish Governmental Department   Go to the IPH Website
BELGIAN BIOSAFETY SERVER
  [Home Page] [Previous Menu] [Search]

SARS Coronavirus
Biosafety recommendations for Belgian diagnostic and research laboratories

(Author: P. Herman) (Last revised: February 28, 2006 )

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Introduction - Classification and Biosafety recommendations - Additional informations

Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a respiratory illness, which has its origins in Guangdong Province, China. The earliest known cases were identified in mid-November 2002. The syndrome has spread in Asia, North America, Africa and Europe, with 8098 suspected and probable cases of SARS, including 774 deaths up to September 26th, 2003, reported to the World Health Organization (WHO). In response to the SARS outbreak, WHO coordinated an international collaboration that included clinical, epidemiologic, and laboratory investigations, and initiated efforts to control the spread of SARS.

The mechanisms of SARS transmission remain unclear. However, on the basis of the reported exposures for the majority of cases (i.e., household contacts and health care workers), the primary way that SARS appears to spread is by close person-to-person contact involving exposure to infectious droplets of respiratory secretions from an infected person, by the faecal-oral route and likely by mechanical transmission. Indirect transmission by aerosolized material or animal vector as roof rats is not excluded as suggested by the peculiar outbreak in the Amoy Gardens in Hong Kong.

According to the latest findings, the etiologic agent primarily responsible for the syndrome is a previously unrecognised virus belonging to the family of coronaviruses, currently called SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV).

Around 30% of SARS cases were reported to occur in health care workers in direct contact with patients, however until now SARS-CoV laboratory-acquired infections were not demonstrated. A doctoral student was reported positive for the virus in Singapore recently ( (564 kb) report from Singapore authorities). This man was working in a virology laboratory but not manipulating intentionally SARS-CoV. If this case represents a confirmed case of a laboratory accident it raises the question of biosafety for laboratories involved in SARS-CoV manipulation. An other case of suspected SARS laboratory-acquired infection was reported more recently in Taiwan.

Classification and Biosafety recommendations

The Section of Biosafety and biotechnology considers that the under-mentioned containment measures are theoretically sufficient to prevent risks to human health and the environment. However such assessment is only indicative and without prejudice of the final provisions that could be decided by competent authorities, regarding the realistic applicability and predictability of the proposed containment measures and the bound laboratory practices.

There is no case of SARS reported in Belgium up to now and there is so far no routine diagnostic. Anticipating future SARS-CoV manipulation in Belgian laboratories, a class of risk (or risk group) and the biosafety levels for SARS-CoV manipulation have to be determined based on a thorough risk assessment. Taking into account that there is so far no SARS case reported in Belgium and based on a scientific risk assessment related to the contained use of biological agents, the SARS-CoV was at least classified as an agent of class of biological risk 3.

The SARS-CoV should be handled in appropriate biosafety containment levels in order to avoid laboratory acquired infections and spread of the disease in the human population and the environment.

Diagnostics activities with inactivated clinical specimens from suspect cases and specimens originating from countries where SARS is documented but from not SARS suspect cases, should be performed under biosafety level 2 (L2) conditions. Diagnostic activities involving non-inactivated clinical specimens from SARS suspect cases should be carried out under biosafety containment level 2 with level 3 (L3) safety equipment and L3 work practices and waste disposal management. Special emphasis should be made on potential spread by droplets, air and/or contaminated surfaces and objects.

Viral cell cultures and manipulations of cultured SARS-CoV for diagnostic as well as for research or production purposes (e.g. preparation of diagnostic tests for SARS) require L3 facilities, equipment and work practices and waste disposal management.

All activities involving inoculated animals require A3 facilities, equipment and work practices and waste disposal management . When possible, a class II biological safety cabinet is used (e.g. inoculations to small animals).

(see Flow chart hereafter synthesizing the required containment measures for manipulating SARS related samples).

* without culture, amplification of SARS-CoV or use of cultured, amplified SARS-CoV
** HEPA filtered mask and restricted entrance

Additional informations

Helpful links, Guidelines and references

Storage and Transport of SARS-CoV

 [Home Page] [Previous Menu] [Search] Copyright ©2005 IPH-SBB  Contact  Privacy